[unixODBC-support] 64-bit DB2 support/usage question

David Ritter David.Ritter at roguewave.com
Fri Aug 27 22:28:56 BST 2010

Hi Nick,

That certainly is my suspicion was well, but I don't see where.  My application is using SQLLEN everywhere I think it should be and as far as I can tell from the DB2 header files.

I'll take another look and see if I can spot anything I missed.  Do you (or anyone else) have any experience using the DB2 client in 64-bit?  Is there anything special I need to do to indicate to the DB2 client to use the 64-bit SQLLEN definition?


-----Original Message-----
From: unixodbc-support-bounces at mailman.unixodbc.org [mailto:unixodbc-support-bounces at mailman.unixodbc.org] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 1:18 PM
To: Support for the unixODBC project
Subject: Re: [unixODBC-support] 64-bit DB2 support/usage question

David Ritter wrote:
> Hello,
> I am having trouble bulk inserting data when using unixODBC 2.3.0 in a 64-bit application.
> I have a test case where I use SQLBindParameter to insert 5 rows of string data in bulk which demonstrates the issue I am seeing.  I have noted that if I compile my same test directly against the 64-bit DB2 driver it executes correctly.
> Output using unixODBC 2.3.0:
I would guess your amp and DB2 are using one size of SQLLEN, and your 
unixODBC another.

unixODBC-support mailing list
unixODBC-support at mailman.unixodbc.org

More information about the unixODBC-support mailing list