[unixODBC-support] unixODBC and SQL_MAX_DSN_LENGTH
nick.gorham at easysoft.com
Fri Sep 14 15:38:07 BST 2007
Douglas K. Fischer wrote:
>I have an environment in which the DSN strings would be longer than what
>is currently set in SQL_MAX_DSN_LENGTH (32). While it's trivial for me
>to increase this to, say, 64, I wanted to see if anyone had enough
>knowledge of the unixODBC guts to indicate whether or not such an
>increase would cause issues with other buffer/variable size assumptions,
>i.e. is making such an increase going to break something else?
>unixODBC-support mailing list
>unixODBC-support at easysoft.com
I would hope not, but if it did let me know and we can fix it.
More information about the unixODBC-support