[unixODBC-support] driver logging

Nick Gorham nick.gorham at easysoft.com
Fri Mar 4 17:14:59 GMT 2005


Eric Sharkey wrote:

>And the 2.2.11 tarball builds ok for me (once I kick sqp/lex.c the same
>way I had to kick it for 2.2.10...)
>  
>

Thats a relief (for me anyway, having just done the release)

>So the difference is aclocal/automake?
>
>diffing the generated Makefiles...
>
>Hmm, I saw this before when I tried (and failed) to build unixODBC-2.2.10
>Debian packages.  The problem seems to be shared library extension
>detection.
>
>The Makefile built on my system from cvs has:
>
>SHLIBEXT = 
>
>while the one from the tarball has
>
>SHLIBEXT = .so
>
>and this seems to be causing the problem.  I'm not sure what the root
>cause of this is yet.
>  
>

Ah, yes, I have had that reported on suse as well. I haven't managed to 
get it to happen on a machine where I can track down whats going wrong.

-- 
Nick



More information about the unixODBC-support mailing list