[unixODBC-dev] unixODBC versus libiodbc: can they coexist?

Nick Gorham nick at lurcher.org
Mon Jun 8 07:52:04 BST 2009


ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
>> On Friday 05 June 2009 10:05:45 am Nick Gorham wrote:
>>     
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>       
>>>> A long time ago (apparently before 2000) somebody put "Conflicts:
>>>>         
> iodbc"
>   
>>>> into the Red Hat/Fedora specfile for unixODBC.  This indicates
>>>>         
> that 
>   
>>>> the two packages are so incompatible it's not even safe to install
>>>>         
>
>   
>>>> them together.  I'm being asked why that is, and I have no idea.  
>>>> Can anyone comment on whether such a restriction is really needed?
>>>>
>>>> 			regards, tom lane
>>>>         
>>> Well, the only possible problem I can see is that iODBC also
>>>       
> installs 
>   
>>> a libodbc.so and a libodbcinst.so
>>>       
>> Hmmm - what about the contents of the ini files being slightly
>>     
> different?
>   
>
> And what about ABI incompatibility ??
>   
Well AFAIK, the two driver managers do the same job, it depends on how 
the iodbc is build though, as it seems to be built expecting 4 byte 
unicode. I have swapped apps between all three driver managers in the 
past with general success, though it sometimes needs a bit of help from 
the driver.

-- 
Nick


More information about the unixODBC-dev mailing list