[unixODBC-dev] unixODBC versus libiodbc: can they coexist?
Nick Gorham
nick at lurcher.org
Mon Jun 8 07:52:04 BST 2009
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
>> On Friday 05 June 2009 10:05:45 am Nick Gorham wrote:
>>
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>> A long time ago (apparently before 2000) somebody put "Conflicts:
>>>>
> iodbc"
>
>>>> into the Red Hat/Fedora specfile for unixODBC. This indicates
>>>>
> that
>
>>>> the two packages are so incompatible it's not even safe to install
>>>>
>
>
>>>> them together. I'm being asked why that is, and I have no idea.
>>>> Can anyone comment on whether such a restriction is really needed?
>>>>
>>>> regards, tom lane
>>>>
>>> Well, the only possible problem I can see is that iODBC also
>>>
> installs
>
>>> a libodbc.so and a libodbcinst.so
>>>
>> Hmmm - what about the contents of the ini files being slightly
>>
> different?
>
>
> And what about ABI incompatibility ??
>
Well AFAIK, the two driver managers do the same job, it depends on how
the iodbc is build though, as it seems to be built expecting 4 byte
unicode. I have swapped apps between all three driver managers in the
past with general success, though it sometimes needs a bit of help from
the driver.
--
Nick
More information about the unixODBC-dev
mailing list