[unixODBC-dev] unixODBC versus libiodbc: can they coexist?
Nick Gorham
nick at lurcher.org
Sat Jun 6 10:05:38 BST 2009
Peter Harvey wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2009 10:05:45 am Nick Gorham wrote:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> A long time ago (apparently before 2000) somebody put "Conflicts: iodbc"
>>> into the Red Hat/Fedora specfile for unixODBC. This indicates that the
>>> two packages are so incompatible it's not even safe to install them
>>> together. I'm being asked why that is, and I have no idea. Can anyone
>>> comment on whether such a restriction is really needed?
>>>
>>> regards, tom lane
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unixODBC-dev mailing list
>>> unixODBC-dev at mailman.unixodbc.org
>>> http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
>>>
>> Well, the only possible problem I can see is that iODBC also installs a
>> libodbc.so and a libodbcinst.so
>>
>
> Hmmm - what about the contents of the ini files being slightly different?
>
> --
> Peter
>
>
Yes, thats a point as well, but I think we read iodbc style ini files
ok, not sure about the other way round though.
--
Nick
More information about the unixODBC-dev
mailing list