nick at lurcher.org
Mon Dec 22 07:58:47 GMT 2008
Peter Harvey wrote:
>Looks like a lot of work went into odbctest but is it fully baked? I
>look at tools.cpp and the samples (ie quiktest.c) and it appears to be
>inconsistent in terms of the interface. The odbctest port to pure qt4
>went very well until I hit this final bit and now I find myself changing
>a lot of the code and even wondering if tools.cpp should be rewritten.
>unixODBC-dev mailing list
>unixODBC-dev at mailman.unixodbc.org
If I remember, I tried to match the MS interface, it is a bit odd, and I
wonder is its ever been used.
What part are you finding inconsistent?
I will take a look and remind myself of that part.
As you say, the original work was in the main part, not the automated
More information about the unixODBC-dev