nick at lurcher.org
Mon Nov 5 21:37:02 GMT 2007
Peter Harvey wrote:
> I have to wonder if using ICU instead of iconv would better support
> loss-less string handling within unixODBC? Would probably mean that
> some string handling code could be removed from __info.c and that
> strings would never have to be dumbed down due to a lack of feature
> support in iconv.
> I know that ICU is not best represented in C (as compared to C++ and
> Java) but may be a better fit than iconv?
> unixODBC-dev mailing list
> unixODBC-dev at easysoft.com
Not sure, what is it, and what does it do?
More information about the unixODBC-dev