[unixODBC-dev] iconv/ICU

Peter Harvey pharvey at peterharvey.org
Mon Nov 5 22:05:57 GMT 2007


I have to wonder if using ICU instead of iconv would better support 
loss-less string handling within unixODBC? Would probably mean that some 
string handling code could be removed from __info.c and that strings 
would never have to be dumbed down due to a lack of feature support in 

I know that ICU is not best represented in C (as compared to C++ and 
Java) but may be a better fit than iconv?


More information about the unixODBC-dev mailing list