[unixODBC-dev] (no subject)

Igor Korot ikorot at earthlink.net
Mon Nov 7 17:20:57 GMT 2005


Yes, I am sorry for the confusion.
Thank you for confirmation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Gorham <nick.gorham at easysoft.com>
Sent: Nov 6, 2005 11:46 PM
To: Igor Korot <ikorot at earthlink.net>, Development issues and topics for unixODBC <unixodbc-dev at easysoft.com>
Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] (no subject)

Igor Korot wrote:

>Hi, ALL,
>I was looking at the unixODBC version 2.2.6, and I found some inconsistency. Hopefully this is already fixed in the 2.2.11, but I want to make sure...
>When I started coding with the 2.2.6, I used the function SQLDataSources(). Because my code run, and I didn't get what I was suppose to, I started looking. The 6th parameter of the function should return the description of the driver in the file odbcinst.ini. With the unixODBC 2.2.6, the function returned the Driver library name.
>
>I just hoped that with the fix of the SQLConfigDataSource() and the ODBCConfig will run successfully I will be able to check this as well. But I hope that somebody already mentined this here, and it's already been fixed.
>
>Thank you.
>_______________________________________________
>unixODBC-dev mailing list
>unixODBC-dev at easysoft.com
>http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
>
>
>  
>
Yes, I think that has now changed, On windows it returns the driver 
name, not the description as such, but the text that could be used in 
the DRIVER= part of a connect string, so I believe the unixODBC version 
is to return the Driver= entry, but to not convert that to the actual 
lib name.

-- 
Nick Gorham
Easysoft Limited




More information about the unixODBC-dev mailing list