[unixODBC-dev] building source tarballs from cvs?

Stefan Radman Stefan.Radman at CTBTO.ORG
Wed Mar 9 17:03:20 GMT 2005


Nick Gorham wrote:
> cd gODBCConfig
> ./autogen.sh
So that's the way it works.
I was always wondering why gODBCConfig/depcomp was missing from the
distribution tarballs.
Guess the "ln -s ../depcomp" can be removed from unixODBC-sr.spec in the
next release.

Stefan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: unixodbc-dev-bounces at easysoft.com 
> [mailto:unixodbc-dev-bounces at easysoft.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
> Sent: Wednesday, 09 March, 2005 17:39
> To: Development issues and topics for unixODBC
> Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] building source tarballs from cvs?
> 
> Eric Sharkey wrote:
> >>I normally do
> >>
> >>make -f Makefile.cvs
> >>./configure
> >>make
> >>make dist
> >>
> >>doesn't that work for you ?
> > 
> > 
> > No, it doesn't.
> > 
> 
> 
> Ok, add a couple of lines,
> 
> make -f Makefile.cvs
> ./configure
> make
> cd gODBCConfig
> ./autogen.sh
> cd ..
> make dist
> 
> It needs the missing header files though, I will update the 
> repository 
> to fix this.
> 
> 
> > 
> >>I am not sure if the glade source for gODBCConfig still 
> exists, I will 
> >>try and search it out. It only started life as glade, then 
> I did much 
> >>more by hand. It was converted from a simple binary, to a 
> loadable lib 
> >>so it was of use to the gnomedb folk.
> > 
> > 
> > Oh, dear.  Fixing the user interface will be a lot easier 
> if you have
> > the glade files.  If you don't, it would probably be easier 
> to rebuild
> > the UI from scratch and just patch in code from the callbacks.
> 
> Ok, you may have to do that, but again, remember it needs to 
> produce a 
> gtkwidget not just a executable.
> 
> -- 
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> unixODBC-dev mailing list
> unixODBC-dev at easysoft.com
> http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
> 




More information about the unixODBC-dev mailing list