[unixODBC-dev] what should I fix?
nick.gorham at Easysoft.com
Mon Mar 7 16:33:45 GMT 2005
Eric Sharkey wrote:
>Hi Nick, et. al.,
>I want to avoid stepping on people's toes if possible. Can you clarify
>where you would like me to be free to commit to the repository and
>what I should leave to you? I'm assuming anything under the tests
>directory is fair game, but if there's something else that needs fixing,
>should I go ahead and fix it, or send the patch through you?
>Currently in my working directory, I have a patch to sqp/lex.l to allow
>the code to build with newer versions of flex (2.5.31). (It just moves
>the code currently in the user subroutine section to the definition section,
>where it really belongs (for all versions of (f)lex), and adds a
>#define for YY_SKIP_YYWRAP.)
>The newer flex versions undefine most of the internal macros for the
>user subroutine section, so the use of YY_FLUSH_BUFFER in yyerror
>is invalid when in that section.
>Also, the debian directory is really really out of date. The current
>Debian maintainer is not answering my email. I've written to him three
>times over the last year (last March, last October, and this March)
>and he hasn't replied. Have any of you had any contact with him
>unixODBC-dev mailing list
>unixODBC-dev at easysoft.com
I think the bits that I would want to know about are
I think the stuff in there has the potential to cause me the most
support work :-)
I can't remember the last time I had something from Steve...
More information about the unixODBC-dev